Home
News
Displays
Merchandise
Pictures
Message Board
Links
Supporters
Support Us
Contact Us
Display Enquiry
ML407 Discussion Board
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
May 18, 2012, 03:29:58 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
6400
Posts in
1051
Topics by
381
Members
Latest Member:
Roger Wilco
ML407 Discussion Board
ML407 Discussion
General ML407 Discussion
(Moderators:
James Wheeler
,
Darren Harbar
,
Olivia Grace
,
Clive From Canada
)
Spitfire Landing Question
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: Spitfire Landing Question (Read 818 times)
tailwheel
Supporter
Flight Officer
Offline
Posts: 239
I love ML407!
Spitfire Landing Question
«
on:
October 06, 2006, 10:48:20 PM »
Is there any rule of thumb for determining the 'blind' visibility forward/below of the Spitfire when on landing approach(eg: one mile for every thousand feet of altitude.),and does this vary for the Griffin powered variants? I understand forward view necesitates the curved approach for this reason.
Hows that for a Spitfire Question Gatemaster ?!!
Logged
You can't go wrong if you play a little bit of that CREEDENCE song
Gate Master
Supporter
Wing Commander
Offline
Posts: 888
Rabbit Leader to Cowslip Control
Re: Spitfire Landing Question
«
Reply #1 on:
October 07, 2006, 11:11:46 AM »
Yes a very good question which needs to be answered by someone in the know.
I think a straight in blind approach using 1000' per mile would be OK if the field was flat and a couple of miles square.
The curved approach is much more sensible and for my own part I always prefer to see where I am going !!
Let's wait for an expert to tell us.
Regards
Andy D
Logged
Carolyn Grace
Flight Crew
Squadron Leader
Offline
Posts: 352
I love ML407!
Re: Spitfire Landing Question
«
Reply #2 on:
October 11, 2006, 07:14:41 PM »
There is not a set down rule for landing a Spitfire Merlin or Griffon are the same - you cannot see a thing if you end up in a straigh on approach hence the curved approach. If you end up straight on - at first the runway starts to disappear then the whole airfield will go from view. However sometimes you do end up in a straight in app and then you have to use carefully the rudder to check you are on line at the flare out having first picked up a landmark on the horizon in line with the runway and with a cross wind it gets exciting.
Carolyn Grace
Logged
tailwheel
Supporter
Flight Officer
Offline
Posts: 239
I love ML407!
Re: Spitfire Landing Question
«
Reply #3 on:
October 11, 2006, 08:07:35 PM »
Hi Carolyn
Thanks for the view from the "office".If ML407 were a Seafire,How about putting her down on a ship?
Personally,I wouldn't even like to think about it.!
Kind regards,
Tailwheel
Logged
You can't go wrong if you play a little bit of that CREEDENCE song
James Wheeler
Forum Admin
Administrator
Wing Commander
Offline
Posts: 777
Re: Spitfire Landing Question
«
Reply #4 on:
October 11, 2006, 11:59:44 PM »
I think it is the same principle with curved approach..
I have a video somewhere of aircraft landing on carriers from the war, mostly American aircraft but the principle is the same on tail draggers I suppose.
I will have a look for you tomorrow and post a link to the video.
Logged
http://jwheeler.me.uk
tailwheel
Supporter
Flight Officer
Offline
Posts: 239
I love ML407!
Re: Spitfire Landing Question
«
Reply #5 on:
October 12, 2006, 07:45:59 PM »
Thanks,James,Look forward to it.
Logged
You can't go wrong if you play a little bit of that CREEDENCE song
Gate Master
Supporter
Wing Commander
Offline
Posts: 888
Rabbit Leader to Cowslip Control
Re: Spitfire Landing Question
«
Reply #6 on:
October 13, 2006, 07:53:29 AM »
I seem to remember reading or watching a program about carrier landings and the curved approach which was instigated by the Fleet Air Arm. I remember that they were using Corsairs as the Americans had had many a/c lost when doing a straight in approach due to the lack of visibility. This was then taken on board by both parties and things improved dramatically.
Can anyone confirm this....if so another British invention we can put our mark on !
Regards
Andy D
Logged
James Wheeler
Forum Admin
Administrator
Wing Commander
Offline
Posts: 777
Re: Spitfire Landing Question
«
Reply #7 on:
October 13, 2006, 08:06:49 AM »
I sent you a private message on this board Tailwheel, you should be notified by email about it.
Logged
http://jwheeler.me.uk
tailwheel
Supporter
Flight Officer
Offline
Posts: 239
I love ML407!
Re: Spitfire Landing Question
«
Reply #8 on:
October 13, 2006, 09:27:14 PM »
HI James,
Many thanks for your reply.
I think this demonstrates the courage and airmanship of these brave young pilots.
For those who have been fortunate to visit East Kirkby and seen the inscription on the Meridian stone is appropriate:
May Their Efforts Never Be Wasted
Cheers
Tailwheel
Logged
You can't go wrong if you play a little bit of that CREEDENCE song
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
ML407 Discussion
-----------------------------
=> General ML407 Discussion
=> Banter from the Mess
===> 2006 Displays
===> 2007 Displays
===> 2008 Displays
===> 2009 Displays
===> 2010 Displays
=> Photos Board
===> ML407 Photos
===> Misc Photos
-----------------------------
Help, Support and Testing
-----------------------------
=> Announcements
=> Help Board
=> Sand Box
Loading...