Home
News
Displays
Merchandise
Pictures
Message Board
Links
Supporters
Support Us
Contact Us
Display Enquiry
ML407 Discussion Board
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
May 21, 2012, 08:29:43 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
6405
Posts in
1053
Topics by
382
Members
Latest Member:
PSimon23
ML407 Discussion Board
ML407 Discussion
Banter from the Mess
(Moderators:
James Wheeler
,
Darren Harbar
,
Olivia Grace
,
Clive From Canada
)
another photography question
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: another photography question (Read 1509 times)
Dan
Flight Officer
Offline
Posts: 103
another photography question
«
on:
February 07, 2010, 01:42:31 AM »
last year i had a point n shoot camera when i visited duxford ,the pics were pretty poor and i was gutted i didnt get the pics i wanted so i have spoilt myselt and bought a dslr in the shape of a nikon d90
i have been experimenting with static objects with diferent apperture and shutter speed settings but it aint guna help when i want t take pics of airbourne planes.
Does anyone have any advice on camera settings for acheiving decent pictures
thanks in advance
Dan
Logged
make sure you do what you want today because tomorrow never comes
Graeme
Supporter
Flight Cadet
Offline
Posts: 19
I love ML407!
Re: another photography question
«
Reply #1 on:
February 07, 2010, 06:19:29 PM »
Hi Dan,
I have a D90 too, a good investment in my opinion. It has held its value well.
The D90 is a camera aimed at the semi-pro, as I have found out to my cost. Its been a very steep learning curve.
A fast lens is important for good accurate focusing. I use a sigma 300ml, a sigma 500ml and the kit 105. VR is essential for hand held photos.
I often set the camera to shutter priority and use about 1/80th sec that usually blurs the props on aircraft, (so that it doesn't look like its floating in mid air) but you don't lose detail on the rest of the image.
Panning is a handy technique to master: when aircraft are taking off, and there are videos posted on youtube that will help with that. Centre weighting will also help in this scenario. A polariser will help to add depth of colour to skies.
I have bought a battery pack that holds 2 re chargables or 6 AAs. There is nothing worse than running out of power. This much battery power will comfortably get you through any air event and probably the next too. the pack will set you back about £120+ batteries. It is a bit heavy, but oddly; it seems to balance the camera. Its now much more comfortable to use, and it has a shutter release near the base for portrait style photos.
Nikon D90 for dummies has been very helpfull too, the actual Nikon manual is a bit um? dry! You might get lucky, and get one from you local library.
Above all keep experimenting with the settings, there is so much available on this camera.
Good luck.
Regards,
Graeme.
Logged
James Wheeler
Forum Admin
Administrator
Wing Commander
Offline
Posts: 777
Re: another photography question
«
Reply #2 on:
February 07, 2010, 06:30:50 PM »
1/80 is very very slow. I would aim a bit higher at 1/250 - 1/320 on take off or on a pass when the aircraft is under plenty of power.
1/80 I usually reserve for idling, taxiing or landing shots.
I don't know what all the settings are called in Nikon land, you want it on the auto focus setting which tracks moving objects and on centre point focus mostly.
Logged
http://jwheeler.me.uk
Dan
Flight Officer
Offline
Posts: 103
Re: another photography question
«
Reply #3 on:
February 07, 2010, 09:49:19 PM »
Thanks fellas im gunna need all the help i can get
i only have the kit lens at the moment , il have to wait for a better one should have invested in one before i visit duxford next tho
plenty of practice then before show season starts then .
Dan
Logged
make sure you do what you want today because tomorrow never comes
James Wheeler
Forum Admin
Administrator
Wing Commander
Offline
Posts: 777
Re: another photography question
«
Reply #4 on:
February 07, 2010, 11:27:07 PM »
Put your money into good glass where you can. It will outlast many bodies if you get a good lens
Logged
http://jwheeler.me.uk
MattHunt
Flight Officer
Offline
Posts: 206
Re: another photography question
«
Reply #5 on:
February 09, 2010, 04:08:06 PM »
If the D90 permits, you want to use 9 point AF, set AF tracking to 'long' and the focus mode switch (front, left hand side near the lens mount on the F80/D300/D700) to AF-C.
Also you will find the camera is prone to underexpose the plane because of the brighter sky. Either try spot metering (but you need to be able to keep the focus point (which is typically where the camera meters from for spot metering) bang on target) or use Matrix and dial in about +0.7 to +1.0 EV.
You can also up the ISO a bit to let you keep keep a smaller aperture (bigger depth of focus) without having to move to a slower shutter speed.
Have fund
Matt
Logged
http://www.flickr.com/photos/reactivefilm/
http://matthewhuntphotography.blogspot.com/
James Wheeler
Forum Admin
Administrator
Wing Commander
Offline
Posts: 777
Re: another photography question
«
Reply #6 on:
February 09, 2010, 06:10:44 PM »
I don't tend to use spot metering as there is a good chance (if it is sunny, haha!) to get a glint of sunlight in your spot metering area which will throw off the exposure.
Centre weighted metering if Nikon supports it might be another viable option.
AF points I tend to use the centre one, although that may change with the 7D
I use all the points on formations.
Logged
http://jwheeler.me.uk
MattHunt
Flight Officer
Offline
Posts: 206
Re: another photography question
«
Reply #7 on:
February 10, 2010, 11:12:02 AM »
Centre weighted ought to be there but I tend not to use it since I feel it is a bit of a half-way-house (although I've used it for years with my Pentax Spotmatic!)
James clearly has better luck with the weather than I do...I am not sure I have a proper sunny shot from my last 3 airshows.
How is the back btw?
Logged
http://www.flickr.com/photos/reactivefilm/
http://matthewhuntphotography.blogspot.com/
James Wheeler
Forum Admin
Administrator
Wing Commander
Offline
Posts: 777
Re: another photography question
«
Reply #8 on:
February 10, 2010, 12:44:46 PM »
Much better thanks
Walking normally now and panning is somewhat easier
You're just going to the wrong shows Matt
Or not enough!
Logged
http://jwheeler.me.uk
MattHunt
Flight Officer
Offline
Posts: 206
Re: another photography question
«
Reply #9 on:
February 10, 2010, 01:37:18 PM »
Oh good news!
Panning
...
Well I might be going to a few more this year because apparently we (my employers) are sponsoring one this year. Copies of 'Spitfire - the One' are floating around and for a moment I thought somebody was going to say we'd sponsired a Spitfire, but sadly not.
Must send 100-300 off for a service!
Logged
http://www.flickr.com/photos/reactivefilm/
http://matthewhuntphotography.blogspot.com/
Dan
Flight Officer
Offline
Posts: 103
Re: another photography question
«
Reply #10 on:
February 11, 2010, 09:22:14 PM »
ive read all the above and as soon as i can get out in the light i will put all your ideas into practice .
one again thanks guys
Dan
Logged
make sure you do what you want today because tomorrow never comes
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
ML407 Discussion
-----------------------------
=> General ML407 Discussion
=> Banter from the Mess
===> 2006 Displays
===> 2007 Displays
===> 2008 Displays
===> 2009 Displays
===> 2010 Displays
=> Photos Board
===> ML407 Photos
===> Misc Photos
-----------------------------
Help, Support and Testing
-----------------------------
=> Announcements
=> Help Board
=> Sand Box
Loading...